Discussion:
Invasion of Iraq was planned before 911 so was the war in Afghanistan
(too old to reply)
s***@yahoo.com
2004-01-17 16:16:19 UTC
Permalink
FORMER TREASURY SECRETARY PAUL ONEILL SAYS INVASION OF IRAQ WAS
PLANNED IN THE FIRST DAYS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION LONG BEFORE 9/11,
IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW SUNDAY ON "60 MINUTES"
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9.htm


Sat Jan 10 2004 09:12:37 ET


The Bush Administration began laying plans for an invasion of Iraq
including the use of American troops within days of President Bush's
inauguration in January of 2001, not eight months later after the 9/11
attacks as has been previously reported. That is what former Treasury
Secretary Paul O'Neill says in his first interview about his time as a
White House insider. O'Neill talks to Lesley Stahl in the interview,
to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Jan. 11 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on
the CBS Television Network.

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein
was a bad person and that he needed to go," he tells Stahl. "For me,
the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to
do whatever we decide to do is a really huge leap," says O'Neill.

O'Neill, fired by the White House for his disagreement on tax cuts, is
the main source for an upcoming book, "The Price of Loyalty," authored
by Ron Suskind. Suskind says O'Neill and other White House insiders he
interviewed gave him documents that show that in the first three
months of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for
removing Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of
Saddam's downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping
troops, war crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil. "There are
memos," Suskind tells Stahl, "One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan
for Post-Saddam Iraq.'" A Pentagon document, says Suskind, titled
"Foreign Suitors For Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," outlines areas of oil
exploration. "It talks about contractors around the world from...30,
40 countries and which ones have what intentions on oil in Iraq,"
Suskind says.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.c_.shtml

In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one
in a National Security Council meeting questioned why Iraq should be
invaded. "It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone
of it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" says
O'Neill in the book.

Suskind also writes about a White House meeting in which he says the
president seems to be wavering about going forward with his second
round of tax cuts. "Haven't we already given money to rich people,"
Suskind says the president uttered, according to a nearly verbatim
transcript of an Economic Team meeting he says he obtained from
someone at the meeting, "Shouldn't we be giving money to the middle?"

O'Neill, who was asked to resign because of his opposition to the tax
cut, says he doesn't think his tell-all account in this book will be
attacked by his former employers as sour grapes. "I will be really
disappointed if [the White House] reacts that way," he tells Stahl. "I
can't imagine that I am going to be attacked for telling the truth."

Developing...
redclay
2004-01-17 16:20:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@yahoo.com
FORMER TREASURY SECRETARY PAUL ONEILL SAYS INVASION OF IRAQ WAS
PLANNED IN THE FIRST DAYS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION LONG BEFORE 9/11,
IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW SUNDAY ON "60 MINUTES"
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9.htm
Sat Jan 10 2004 09:12:37 ET
Of course it was. Search wolfowitz, perle, libby and feith for the reasons
why Iraq was
invaded. Follow the references to the various societies, think tanks and
committees they have set up to promote the Zionists' programs.
These four horsemen of the neo-conservative apocalypse and their army of
pork-eating
Zionists have declared a holy war against those who oppose the invasion and
occupation of the land once known as Palestine by the Jews.
Julian D.
2004-01-17 18:02:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@yahoo.com
FORMER TREASURY SECRETARY PAUL ONEILL SAYS INVASION OF IRAQ WAS
PLANNED IN THE FIRST DAYS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION LONG BEFORE 9/11,
IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW SUNDAY ON "60 MINUTES"
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9.htm
It better have been planned before Bush was elected. It was official
US policy to liberate Iraq since the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998.



The Iraq Liberation Act (by President Bill Clinton)
October 31, 1998
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
October 31, 1998
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
Today I am signing into law H.R. 4655, the "Iraq Liberation Act of
1998."
This Act makes clear that it is the sense of the Congress that the
United States should support those elements of the Iraqi opposition
that advocate a very different future for Iraq than the bitter reality
of internal repression and external aggression that the current regime
in Baghdad now offers.
Let me be clear on what the U.S. objectives are: The United States
wants Iraq to rejoin the family of nations as a freedom-loving and
law-abiding member. This is in our interest and that of our allies
within the region. The United States favors an Iraq that offers its
people freedom at home. I categorically reject arguments that this is
unattainable due to Iraq's history or its ethnic or sectarian make-up.
Iraqis deserve and desire freedom like everyone else. The United
States looks forward to a democratically supported regime that would
permit us to enter into a dialogue leading to the reintegration of
Iraq into normal international life.
My Administration has pursued, and will continue to pursue, these
objectives through active application of all relevant United Nations
Security Council resolutions. The evidence is overwhelming that such
changes will not happen under the current Iraq leadership.
In the meantime, while the United States continues to look to the
Security Council's efforts to keep the current regime's behavior in
check, we look forward to new leadership in Iraq that has the support
of the Iraqi people. The United States is providing support to
opposition groups from all sectors of the Iraqi community that could
lead to a popularly supported government.
On October 21, 1998, I signed into law the Omnibus Consolidated and
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, which made $8 million
available for assistance to the Iraqi democratic opposition. This
assistance is intended to help the democratic opposition unify, work
together more effectively, and articulate the aspirations of the Iraqi
people for a pluralistic, participa--tory political system that will
include all of Iraq's diverse ethnic and religious groups.
As required by the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for FY
1998 (Public Law 105-174), the Department of State submitted a report
to the Congress on plans to establish a program to support the
democratic opposition. My Administration, as required by that statute,
has also begun to implement a program to compile information regarding
allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity, and
war crimes by Iraq's current leaders as a step towards bringing to
justice those directly responsible for such acts.
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 provides additional, discretionary
authorities under which my Administration can act to further the
objectives I outlined above. There are, of course, other important
elements of U.S. policy. These include the maintenance of U.N.
Security Council support efforts to eliminate Iraq's weapons and
missile programs and economic sanctions that continue to deny the
regime the means to reconstitute those threats to international peace
and security. United States support for the Iraqi opposition will be
carried out consistent with those policy objectives as well.
Similarly, U.S. support must be attuned to what the opposition can
effectively make use of as it develops over time. With those
observations, I sign H.R. 4655 into law.
WILLIAM J. CLINTON
THE WHITE HOUSE,
October 31, 1998.
Post by s***@yahoo.com
Sat Jan 10 2004 09:12:37 ET
The Bush Administration began laying plans for an invasion of Iraq
including the use of American troops within days of President Bush's
inauguration in January of 2001, not eight months later after the 9/11
attacks as has been previously reported. That is what former Treasury
Secretary Paul O'Neill says in his first interview about his time as a
White House insider. O'Neill talks to Lesley Stahl in the interview,
to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Jan. 11 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on
the CBS Television Network.
"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein
was a bad person and that he needed to go," he tells Stahl. "For me,
the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to
do whatever we decide to do is a really huge leap," says O'Neill.
O'Neill, fired by the White House for his disagreement on tax cuts, is
the main source for an upcoming book, "The Price of Loyalty," authored
by Ron Suskind. Suskind says O'Neill and other White House insiders he
interviewed gave him documents that show that in the first three
months of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for
removing Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of
Saddam's downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping
troops, war crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil. "There are
memos," Suskind tells Stahl, "One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan
for Post-Saddam Iraq.'" A Pentagon document, says Suskind, titled
"Foreign Suitors For Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," outlines areas of oil
exploration. "It talks about contractors around the world from...30,
40 countries and which ones have what intentions on oil in Iraq,"
Suskind says.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.c_.shtml
In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one
in a National Security Council meeting questioned why Iraq should be
invaded. "It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone
of it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" says
O'Neill in the book.
Suskind also writes about a White House meeting in which he says the
president seems to be wavering about going forward with his second
round of tax cuts. "Haven't we already given money to rich people,"
Suskind says the president uttered, according to a nearly verbatim
transcript of an Economic Team meeting he says he obtained from
someone at the meeting, "Shouldn't we be giving money to the middle?"
O'Neill, who was asked to resign because of his opposition to the tax
cut, says he doesn't think his tell-all account in this book will be
attacked by his former employers as sour grapes. "I will be really
disappointed if [the White House] reacts that way," he tells Stahl. "I
can't imagine that I am going to be attacked for telling the truth."
Developing...
JD





"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence
reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his
chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile
delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists,
including Al Qaeda members..."
---- Hillary Clinton, Oct 10, 2002

"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and
tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?
If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations
would come too late."
-President George W. Bush
January 28, 2003
(Another liberal lie exposed.)

"Members and front organizations must continually embarrass, discredit and degrade our critics.
When obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist, or Nazi or anti-Semitic
.... The association will, after enough repetition, become "fact" in the public mind."
--Communist Party, Moscow Central Committee 1943

"This time, I think the Americans are serious.
Bush is not Clinton. I think this is the end."
-Uday Hussein
Ian S
2004-01-17 19:54:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Julian D.
Post by s***@yahoo.com
FORMER TREASURY SECRETARY PAUL ONEILL SAYS INVASION OF IRAQ WAS
PLANNED IN THE FIRST DAYS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION LONG BEFORE 9/11,
IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW SUNDAY ON "60 MINUTES"
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9.htm
It better have been planned before Bush was elected. It was official
US policy to liberate Iraq since the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998.
I see nothing in the following supporting an invasion and occupation of Iraq
by the US.
Post by Julian D.
The Iraq Liberation Act (by President Bill Clinton)
October 31, 1998
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
October 31, 1998
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
Today I am signing into law H.R. 4655, the "Iraq Liberation Act of
1998."
This Act makes clear that it is the sense of the Congress that the
United States should support those elements of the Iraqi opposition
that advocate a very different future for Iraq than the bitter reality
of internal repression and external aggression that the current regime
in Baghdad now offers.
Let me be clear on what the U.S. objectives are: The United States
wants Iraq to rejoin the family of nations as a freedom-loving and
law-abiding member. This is in our interest and that of our allies
within the region. The United States favors an Iraq that offers its
people freedom at home. I categorically reject arguments that this is
unattainable due to Iraq's history or its ethnic or sectarian make-up.
Iraqis deserve and desire freedom like everyone else. The United
States looks forward to a democratically supported regime that would
permit us to enter into a dialogue leading to the reintegration of
Iraq into normal international life.
My Administration has pursued, and will continue to pursue, these
objectives through active application of all relevant United Nations
Security Council resolutions. The evidence is overwhelming that such
changes will not happen under the current Iraq leadership.
In the meantime, while the United States continues to look to the
Security Council's efforts to keep the current regime's behavior in
check, we look forward to new leadership in Iraq that has the support
of the Iraqi people. The United States is providing support to
opposition groups from all sectors of the Iraqi community that could
lead to a popularly supported government.
On October 21, 1998, I signed into law the Omnibus Consolidated and
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, which made $8 million
available for assistance to the Iraqi democratic opposition. This
assistance is intended to help the democratic opposition unify, work
together more effectively, and articulate the aspirations of the Iraqi
people for a pluralistic, participa--tory political system that will
include all of Iraq's diverse ethnic and religious groups.
As required by the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for FY
1998 (Public Law 105-174), the Department of State submitted a report
to the Congress on plans to establish a program to support the
democratic opposition. My Administration, as required by that statute,
has also begun to implement a program to compile information regarding
allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity, and
war crimes by Iraq's current leaders as a step towards bringing to
justice those directly responsible for such acts.
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 provides additional, discretionary
authorities under which my Administration can act to further the
objectives I outlined above. There are, of course, other important
elements of U.S. policy. These include the maintenance of U.N.
Security Council support efforts to eliminate Iraq's weapons and
missile programs and economic sanctions that continue to deny the
regime the means to reconstitute those threats to international peace
and security. United States support for the Iraqi opposition will be
carried out consistent with those policy objectives as well.
Similarly, U.S. support must be attuned to what the opposition can
effectively make use of as it develops over time. With those
observations, I sign H.R. 4655 into law.
WILLIAM J. CLINTON
THE WHITE HOUSE,
October 31, 1998.
Post by s***@yahoo.com
Sat Jan 10 2004 09:12:37 ET
The Bush Administration began laying plans for an invasion of Iraq
including the use of American troops within days of President Bush's
inauguration in January of 2001, not eight months later after the 9/11
attacks as has been previously reported. That is what former Treasury
Secretary Paul O'Neill says in his first interview about his time as a
White House insider. O'Neill talks to Lesley Stahl in the interview,
to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Jan. 11 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on
the CBS Television Network.
"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein
was a bad person and that he needed to go," he tells Stahl. "For me,
the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to
do whatever we decide to do is a really huge leap," says O'Neill.
O'Neill, fired by the White House for his disagreement on tax cuts, is
the main source for an upcoming book, "The Price of Loyalty," authored
by Ron Suskind. Suskind says O'Neill and other White House insiders he
interviewed gave him documents that show that in the first three
months of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for
removing Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of
Saddam's downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping
troops, war crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil. "There are
memos," Suskind tells Stahl, "One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan
for Post-Saddam Iraq.'" A Pentagon document, says Suskind, titled
"Foreign Suitors For Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," outlines areas of oil
exploration. "It talks about contractors around the world from...30,
40 countries and which ones have what intentions on oil in Iraq,"
Suskind says.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.c_.shtml
In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one
in a National Security Council meeting questioned why Iraq should be
invaded. "It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone
of it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" says
O'Neill in the book.
Suskind also writes about a White House meeting in which he says the
president seems to be wavering about going forward with his second
round of tax cuts. "Haven't we already given money to rich people,"
Suskind says the president uttered, according to a nearly verbatim
transcript of an Economic Team meeting he says he obtained from
someone at the meeting, "Shouldn't we be giving money to the middle?"
O'Neill, who was asked to resign because of his opposition to the tax
cut, says he doesn't think his tell-all account in this book will be
attacked by his former employers as sour grapes. "I will be really
disappointed if [the White House] reacts that way," he tells Stahl. "I
can't imagine that I am going to be attacked for telling the truth."
Developing...
JD
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence
reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his
chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile
delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists,
including Al Qaeda members..."
---- Hillary Clinton, Oct 10, 2002
"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and
tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?
If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all
words and all recriminations
Post by Julian D.
would come too late."
-President George W. Bush
January 28, 2003
(Another liberal lie exposed.)
"Members and front organizations must continually embarrass, discredit and
degrade our critics.
Post by Julian D.
When obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist, or Nazi or anti-Semitic
.... The association will, after enough repetition, become "fact" in the public mind."
--Communist Party, Moscow Central Committee 1943
"This time, I think the Americans are serious.
Bush is not Clinton. I think this is the end."
-Uday Hussein
Loading...